Markman Capital Insight

Real Calamity Far Outpaces Virtual Reality at Struggling Social Media Pioneer Meta Networks

Virtual reality is finally ready for the masses. Unfortunately, the masses are still not ready for VR, following years of negative press and uneven promotion.Meta Platforms on Tuesday unveiled Quest Pro, its $1,499 VR headset with eye and face tracking, and color passthrough video for mixed reality. It’s tech Meta badly needs to grow its business.Yet...

Virtual reality is finally ready for the masses. Unfortunately, the masses are still not ready for VR, following years of negative press and uneven promotion.


Meta Platforms on Tuesday unveiled Quest Pro, its $1,499 VR headset with eye and face tracking, and color passthrough video for mixed reality. It’s tech Meta badly needs to grow its business.


Yet investors should continue to avoid Meta shares.


In many ways, Meta is a lesson on the dangers of fetishizing investments. As Facebook, the Menlo Park, Calif.-based company became an icon. During the course of two decades the business grew from an idea in a Harvard dorm room to a global behemoth with nearly three billion monthly users. Mark Zuckerberg, founder and chief executive officer took a scrappy startup and became the home page for 60% of the world’s population with an internet connection.


Facebook seemed unstoppable. Although members didn’t like its clunky user interface, and bewildering privacy choices, they were compelled to maintain their accounts. Facebook was where friends and family congregated online. 


Unfortunately, the company was built atop shifting sands controlled by competitors. That flaw was exposed in 2020 when Apple (AAPL) changed the way its mobile operating system worked, curtailing advertisement tracking. It was a devastating blow to Meta’s digital advertising business.


That change alone led to $12 billion in lost revenue at Meta, according to a report from Forbes.


Meanwhile, poor privacy choices made long ago have come back to haunt Zuckerberg. In the early years Facebook was heavily dependent on third-party developers to drive growth. User and demographic data was routinely made available. The flaw in this business model became apparent in 2018 when Cambridge Analytica used this data to drive disinformation campaigns during the 2016 presidential election run-up.


VR is Zuckerberg’s plan to own the foundation, and build business models with Meta at the core.


This new strategy popped up Tuesday all over the Quest Pro reveal. Several big corporations appeared to be latching onto Meta’ VR coattails. Among other deals, the company announced partnerships with Microsoft (MSFT) for its Teams, Office, and Windows 365 software suites. The Redmond, Wash,-based company’s official blog notes that Xbox Cloud Gaming will also be ported to Meta headsets. YouTube is moving its massive VR video platform to Quest. And NBCUniversal will bring its Peacock streaming application and other content to Quest headsets, according to a report at Variety


Zuckerberg claims that the Quest Store, Meta’s VR app store, has generated $1.5 billion in sales to date, and that 33 of the 400 VR titles there have grossed more than $10 million thus far. 


However, even with these impressive stats the VR business at Meta is a loser. Reality Labs, its VR subsidiary in the second quarter of 2022, lost $2.8 billion, up from $2.4 billion a year ago. Revenues jumped to $452 million, up 48% versus a year ago.



And that’s the rub. Meta’s VR business simply is not big enough to offset its lost revenue from the Apple OS changes. Plenty of people believe VR will never be foundational at Meta. Convincing people to buy expensive computers they will wear on their faces is a tougher sell than building a smartphone application for a device most people feel they can’t live without.  


In this context Facebook is a just an amazing one-hit wonder that touches 3 billion people. Unfortunately. that business is now contracting as gazillions of bored smartphone users waste time on TikTok and other social media rivals instead. Meta is also under constant legislative attack stemming from its past privacy indiscretions.


Investors tend to fetishize companies like Meta, thinking they need to be on Team Meta. But unless you are an employee, there is no Team Meta – only Team You. And you only get something out of Meta shares when they are going from the lower left to the upper right of a chart. If the shares aren’t capable of making you more money, they should be discarded and avoided.


Fetishizing a company is easy to do when you consider Zuckerberg made himself and early shareholders fabulously rich through a series of brilliant maneuvers during the growth phase of Facebook. From the company initial public offering in 2012 through August 2021 shares surged 847%, to a lofty $373. Zuckerberg’s net worth catapulted to $142 billion.  


However, since then it has all downhill. Shares fell on Tuesday to only $128.54.


It’s too early to completely write off VR at Meta, yet is irrational and excessive to bet Zuckerberg can fix declining near term growth with a $1,500 face-worn computer. 


Investors should abandon their Meta fetish and avoid Meta shares. 


Investing can be intimidating, but it doesn't have to be. Let us be your guide to profitable investing with our Strategic Advantage newsletter. Join us for a $1 trial and see for yourself!


This article can also be found on Forbes.com.